• We are implementing a new rule regarding the posting of social media links and Youtube videos, the rule is simple if you are posting these links please say something about it rather than just dropping what we call a "drive by Link", a comment on your thoughts about the content must be included. Thank you
Official Russia laying groundwork for one potential next target after Ukraine, questioning Lithuanian statehood in similar manner as it did Ukraine's.

Russian foreign minister pens foreword to book challenging Lithuanian statehood

A foreword written by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is raising concerns in Eastern Europe that Moscow is once again laying the groundwork to challenge a neighbor’s international borders. Lavrov’s preface appears in a monograph titled “The History of Lithuania,” published in March but only recently noticed by journalists. The book questions the existence of the Lithuanian language and the very statehood of modern-day Lithuania.

Earlier this week, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kestutis Budrys called the monograph a tool of Russian propaganda and likened its message to Vladimir Putin’s July 2021 essay, On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians, in which the president rejected the foundations of Ukrainian sovereignty. (Days before ordering troops into Ukraine, Putin reiterated a key thesis from the essay, claiming that Vladimir Lenin invented the Ukrainian state.)

In his foreword, Lavrov accuses the Baltic states, including Lithuania, of trying to “use falsified historical narratives to incite anti-Russian and Russophobic sentiments.” The book, he says, pushes back against this trend.

The monograph, The History of Lithuania, was published in 2025 by the Moscow State Institute of International Relations’ publishing house. The lead author of the nine-member team was Maxim Grigoryev, head of the pro-Kremlin Foundation for the Study of Democracy Problems, a member of Russia’s Civic Chamber, and chair of the “International Public Tribunal on the Crimes of Ukrainian Neo-Nazis.” Grigoryev is also a veteran of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

“It is a tool for hostile activities against neighboring countries: to question statehood, history, values, symbols, but also to justify Russia’s imperialism and aggression against its neighbors,” Lithuanian Foreign Minister Budrys told LRT Radio on April 30. “We have seen this before, we are seeing it now, and this is just another example.” LRT Radio journalists also reported that Grigoryev’s coauthors include Giedrius Grabauskas, a former associate of Lithuanian politician Algirdas Paleckis who was convicted in July 2021 of spying for Russia.

In the book’s chapter on Lithuania after its separation from the USSR, Grigoryev, Grabauskas, and their coauthors argue that the country today “officially considers itself the successor of the Lithuania of the pro-Nazi dictatorship” under Antanas Smetona. They also write that the “contemporary Lithuanian regime” embraces a “pro-Nazi” ideology and survives “largely” thanks to “police measures and the suppression of dissent.”


Who are of course nazis.
 
Last edited:
German authorities have arrested three Russo-Ukrainians on terrorism charges related to Russian sabotage. One defendant confessed to having received money from a Russian agent in exchange for air-mailing a thermite bomb that was supposed to bring down an aeroplane. A fourth defendant is still at large and believed to be living in Switzerland. They had already "scouted" suitable targets by mailing GPS trackers to different locations to improve their timing for the explosion. (Source)
 
German authorities have arrested three Russo-Ukrainians on terrorism charges related to Russian sabotage. One defendant confessed to having received money from a Russian agent in exchange for air-mailing a thermite bomb that was supposed to bring down an aeroplane. A fourth defendant is still at large and believed to be living in Switzerland. They had already "scouted" suitable targets by mailing GPS trackers to different locations to improve their timing for the explosion. (Source)
3/4 of the pro-RuZZian saboteurs detained in Poland are Ukrainians.
 
The question that arises: Are they doing this because they are keen to make a ‘quick buck’, or are they being blackmailed into abusing their children/family members if they don't do it?
I'd argue you're overthinking this. Don't we have enough citizens of our own who are, shall we say, lapsing in their allegiance to the constitutional order? Right-wing extremists, left-wing extremists, religious nutjobs?

Polls constantly show most Ukrainians are on board with the war effort and the western alliance, but not all of them are. The vast majority of the latter have long since F***ed off to Russia, but not all of them. Some just could not.

It makes sense for the GRU to try and recruit people already sympathetic to Russia, or who bear some unrelated grudge. The additional "benefit" being that Western media consumers only read that an Ukrainian disrespected their hospitality.

Having said that, most of these so-called low-end agents the Russians are recruiting seem to be money-driven. It's been reported numerous times that they contact people whose social media presence suggests they live above their means.
 
Are you saying that the meeting won't happen? That would be a huge faux pa to whichever party doesn't show.
I'm willing to make a bet Putin won't attend. Trump himself said a few hours ago that he isn't sure if Putin will come. He's sent Rubio in his place, which strongly suggests the White House suspects Putin will be a no-show. (Continued at the bottom.)
Also, I just read that Zelensky would like Trump to be there as well. No idea if he will.
Trump wrote he considered going, to which Zelensky replied that he'd welcome it because it would increase the chance of Putin also coming.
Funny he didn't ask any European leaders to join.
And why would he? The negotiations can only and should only be concluded by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia. The biggest issue so far has always been Putin refusing to meet Zelensky or sending any other high-ranking regime official in his stead.

Putin doesn't recognise Ukraine's statehood, he claims Zelensky is an illegitimate president. It would be a monumental U-turn for Putin to change his tune and meet Zelensky regardless, thereby recognising his legitimacy and Ukraine's statehood. Putin's attendance would be akin to him admitting that Russia can't conquer the whole of Ukraine, at least for the time being.

Which is why I'll eat my hat if he does show up.

The attendance of European leaders would decrease the chance of Putin showing up further. Putin is desperate to keep the Europeans out because he knows that to them, it's a vital matter. Trump, on the other hand, has made it clear the war is mainly an annoyance to him.

Besides, Russia is waging this war to push the US out of Europe. Putin himself is obsessed with America and wants to return to the bipolar world order he once swore the defend. For that very reason, he's also rejected the Chinese offer of mediation. In Putin's world view, no one but him and the US president get to sit at the big boys' table.

Also—I'm sure you have noticed the peculiar angle pursued by Russian propaganda recently, with all the throwbacks to WW2? Their foreign minister literally said a couple of days ago that Russia would like to renew the alliance with America against "Europe's fascism". What more does one need to know.

It's a propaganda charade of the highest magnitude.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I'm willing to make a bet Putin won't attend. Trump himself said a few hours ago that he isn't sure if Putin will come. He's sent Rubio in his place, which strongly suggests the White House suspects Putin will be a no-show. (Continued at the bottom.)
Trump wrote he considered going, to which Zelensky replied that he'd welcome it because it would increase the chance of Putin also coming.And why would he? The negotiations can only and should only be concluded by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia. The biggest issue so far has always been Putin refusing to meet Zelensky or sending any other high-ranking regime official in his stead.

Putin doesn't recognise Ukraine's statehood, he claims Zelensky is an illegitimate president. It would be a monumental U-turn for Putin to change his tune and meet Zelensky regardless, thereby recognising his legitimacy and Ukraine's statehood. Putin's attendance would be akin to him admitting that Russia can't conquer the whole of Ukraine, at least for the time being.

Which is why I'll eat my hat if he does show up.

The attendance of European leaders would decrease the chance of Putin showing up further. Putin is desperate to keep the Europeans out because he knows that to them, it's a vital matter. Trump, on the other hand, has made it clear the war is mainly an annoyance to him.

Besides, Russia is waging this war to push the US out of Europe. Putin himself is obsessed with America and wants to return to the bipolar world order he once swore the defend. For that very reason, he's also rejected the Chinese offer of mediation. In Putin's world view, no one but him and the US president get to sit at the big boys' table.

Also—I'm sure you have noticed the peculiar angle pursued by Russian propaganda recently, with all the throwbacks to WW2? Their foreign minister literally said a couple of days ago that Russia would like to renew the alliance with America against "Europe's fascism". What more does one need to know.

It's a propaganda charade of the highest magnitude.
If Putin doesn't show, which is of course a possibility, he will demonstrate that he is a master at effing himself. Also, at that point, I'd say the clock is ticking for new "elections" in Russia within a year. And it will be from someone we've never heard of.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
he will demonstrate that he is a master at effing himself
I'd argue he's already demonstrated that ability.
Also, at that point, I'd say the clock is ticking for new "elections" in Russia within a year. And it will be from someone we've never heard of.
What makes you so awefully optimistic about that?
 
An episode of the assault by a Russian unit, a stronghold of the Ukrainian army, using two TM-62M anti-tank mines. This method of assault has become quite common, anti-tank mines are used instead of grenades, since the effect of their use is stronger. The TM-62M anti-tank mine was developed in the USSR in the early 1960s, it is used by many armies, the mass of explosive in it is up to 10 kg. The video is shortened and filmed in Donbass, the exact location is unknown, as a result of the battle, several Ukrainian servicemen surrendered, shown at the end of the video.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Footage of combat use in Ukraine of the X-39 LMUR guided missile by a Russian Ka-52 helicopter. The location of the shooting is not reported. The video shows a strike by a Russian X-39 missile on a Ukrainian drone control center located in one of the buildings. X-39 missiles can also be used by Mi-28 helicopters.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I'm willing to make a bet Putin won't attend. Trump himself said a few hours ago that he isn't sure if Putin will come. He's sent Rubio in his place, which strongly suggests the White House suspects Putin will be a no-show. (Continued at the bottom.)
Trump wrote he considered going, to which Zelensky replied that he'd welcome it because it would increase the chance of Putin also coming.And why would he? The negotiations can only and should only be concluded by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia. The biggest issue so far has always been Putin refusing to meet Zelensky or sending any other high-ranking regime official in his stead.

Putin doesn't recognise Ukraine's statehood, he claims Zelensky is an illegitimate president. It would be a monumental U-turn for Putin to change his tune and meet Zelensky regardless, thereby recognising his legitimacy and Ukraine's statehood. Putin's attendance would be akin to him admitting that Russia can't conquer the whole of Ukraine, at least for the time being.

Which is why I'll eat my hat if he does show up.

The attendance of European leaders would decrease the chance of Putin showing up further. Putin is desperate to keep the Europeans out because he knows that to them, it's a vital matter. Trump, on the other hand, has made it clear the war is mainly an annoyance to him.

Besides, Russia is waging this war to push the US out of Europe. Putin himself is obsessed with America and wants to return to the bipolar world order he once swore the defend. For that very reason, he's also rejected the Chinese offer of mediation. In Putin's world view, no one but him and the US president get to sit at the big boys' table.

Also—I'm sure you have noticed the peculiar angle pursued by Russian propaganda recently, with all the throwbacks to WW2? Their foreign minister literally said a couple of days ago that Russia would like to renew the alliance with America against "Europe's fascism". What more does one need to know.

It's a propaganda charade of the highest magnitude.
Lets see. I assume Trump is going to chill out in Saudi for another 24 hours? Its only 2 hours in a tired out 747 to Turkey. Or they can meet in the middle at Cyprus, but some of Cyprus is actually British land, so be careful where you land your plane.

Zelensky has to go to Turkey. If I were Putin I would not risk not going. I dont think Donny will be pleased. Donny can be a bit unpredictable, and dare I say it undiplomatic and non-conforming, when he is as the yanks say, pissed.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top