- Joined
- Apr 25, 2019
- Messages
- 4,532
- Points
- 234

Certainly. The author also mentions this. Further evidence the German Navy would like to jump on the opportunity and drop their old design philosophy* is given by TKMS. Their runner-up proposal for the F126 programme should've been an obvious alternative in the current situation; but they've already said they can't build that ship due to "newly requested changes".
There's one aspect still tying the Germans to the old standard, though, and that's software and sensors. Currently, the German Navy uses no fewer than four different battle management systems and as many main sensor suites. Reducing that number to two was a major goal of the old policies. There's no reducing that, at least not in a timely manner, with a MEKO.
*) Triple-redundant automatisation for 2-year-deployments; civilian-standard quarters; ample space for containerised equipment
There's one aspect still tying the Germans to the old standard, though, and that's software and sensors. Currently, the German Navy uses no fewer than four different battle management systems and as many main sensor suites. Reducing that number to two was a major goal of the old policies. There's no reducing that, at least not in a timely manner, with a MEKO.
*) Triple-redundant automatisation for 2-year-deployments; civilian-standard quarters; ample space for containerised equipment