So the OSINT report is misrepresenting what he said?
Yes, what Uri describes is not accurate to what Alaudinov actually says, but Alaudinov is part of the Russian propaganda network so what he says has to be taken with a great degree of salt. I'm certainly not aware of any public policy Ukraine has like Israel's "Hannibal Directive" (which is only used in extreme circumstances).
 

Most analysts (British MOD, ISW etc) conclude that it wouldn't make much difference in the war, Putin isn't going to change course. It's reported that Russia has moved or will move all the targets Ukraine was talking about away from range anyway, since everything has all been so beautifully choreographed publicly...
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Interesting graphics chart starting at around 10.38..Baltic miracle.
 

Most analysts (British MOD, ISW etc) conclude that it wouldn't make much difference in the war, Putin isn't going to change course. It's reported that Russia has moved or will move all the targets Ukraine was talking about away from range anyway, since everything has all been so beautifully choreographed publicly...

It will make a difference. Otherwise little Putler wouldn't get all upset and fire his next nuke/war threat.

To illustrate how desperate he his just take into account him threatening a response to his own choices (invading) and even removing those restrictions self imposed by the West.

I would tell him go ahead prove it. Ukraine can use those long range weapons tomorrow.

The idiocy can't be topped here such a weak loser.
 
So many juicy targets it will disrupt their war effort significantly and even if they move everything much further back that's an achievement in itself.
 
So many juicy targets it will disrupt their war effort significantly and even if they move everything much further back that's an achievement in itself.
Firstly they can't move everything back, loads of heavy industry in the border region which isn't as easy to move back as it was in WW2 (and a massive loss of face for Putler) and they don't have western lend-lease aid to buffer their industry while they move.

Secondly they first had to move everything back 80km inside Ukraine, then 300km. Now they're facing the same issue inside of russia and potentially 1,000km+ if Ukraine gets something like JASSM or Tomahawk.

Their rail network has always been their primary means of transport, and the last leg has to be done by truck. The rail network is static = vulnerable and the truck losses have been massive, around 25,000 already.

There's a limit to what you can do by truck across a limited road network under (at least partial) FPV and missile fire at ever increasing distances.

To put it into perspective the distance from Kharkiv to Moscow is 648km. To get a "safe" distance away from cruise missiles the russians would have to move their main supply hubs back past Yaroslavl, Nizhny Novgorod, Kaban and Samara.
 

plucked-chicken.webp
 
Call me corny or old fashioned, but $h!t like this gets to me.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Many western leaders, even the ones pro-Ukraine, can't wait to welcome the terrorist state back into the international family and make great deals with them :rolleyes:
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Many western leaders, even the ones pro-Ukraine, can't wait to welcome the terrorist state back into the international family and make great deals with them :rolleyes:
Absolutely, have no doubt..
 
Call me corny or old fashioned, but $h!t like this gets to me.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Same here. Those men look like so many other POWs of wars past whose treatment was beyond unpleasant. I wish them long and peaceful lives, surrounded by their loved ones.
 
An episode of an attempt to break through a Ukrainian armored group, into the territory of the Kursk region of Russia, in the Glushkovsky district. To overcome anti-tank obstacles, an IMR-2 engineering vehicle of Soviet manufacture is used. The main purpose of the IMR-2: creating column routes in difficult-to-pass places for the advancement of troops, the Soviet army began using the IMR-2 in 1982. Now it is used by Russia and Ukraine. The advance of the Ukrainian armored group was stopped, the video shows the explosion of one of the IMR-2 engineering vehicles of the group.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Episode of the march throw of the Russian armored group, storming the mine "Yuzhnodonbasskaya №3", this is the Ukrainian division of the Ukrainian army on the Ugledarsky direction. Previously, Russian aviation worked on the mine with FAB bombs and artillery, you can see it in the video. The composition of the armored group, presumably BMP-2 and BMP-3. The group broke through, but one of the BMPs hit a mine, the crew abandoned the combat vehicle. During the march throw, the group was worked by Ukrainian long-range artillery from the Bogatyr area.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top