That's a bit of a stretch, don't you think? No offence, but I think the centrifugal force of this pro-Trump meme-circle you're part of along with
@riderboy,
@Ivan le Fou and others catapults you guys too far out of the orbit every now and again.
Just to be clear,
AGAIN, me defending Trump when warranted does not mean I am pro-Trump.
And,
AGAIN, that article from the Washington Post is, like so many other occurrences, a rush to conclusion.
Yes, it is possible, likely and even reasonable to think, considering the past and the numerous more or less similar cases, that the Kremlin may be involved in this. Do we know for sure though? No. Do we have any ind of credible and material proof as of now? No.
Therefore it is a rush to conclusion.
Yelling "
The West Must Respond" is nothing but an emotional response. And no, the
West does not have to respond if it does not want to (just like HK).
Reminder: the Washington Post has been, the past few years, at the forefront of anything related to Trump, since you decided to bring him up. In term of spreading false information, rumors, unproven accusations, etc... the Washington Post has very very prolific.
Though, despite having no certainty regarding what happened, or at least how it happened and for what reason, and though there are official sources claiming there is no traces of poison whatsoever, some media, including the WP and the NYT (as well as many others) have already jumped to the conclusion that:
-yes it was poison.
-yes it is an attempt to murder Alexei Navalny.
-yes it was Putin.
Therefore something MUST be done.
Nevermind the facts that:
-no, we don't know if it was poison.
-no, we don't know if it was an attempt to murder Alexei Navalny.
-no, we don't know if Putin has anything to do with it.