-
We are implementing a new rule regarding the posting of social media links and Youtube videos, the rule is simple if you are posting these links please say something about it rather than just dropping what we call a "drive by Link", a comment on your thoughts about the content must be included. Thank you
Politics All Things Trump
- Thread starter BravoZulu
- Start date
Thread by @CalltoActivism on Thread Reader App
@CalltoActivism: BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Not ONLY Did Trump remove TOP SECRET documents that could include nuclear secrets, but he claims he previously declassified them. So we just filed a FOIA request to see unredacte...…
threadreaderapp.com
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 14,194
- Points
- 338
Hysterical BS.
Next what? You're going to quote Cenk Yughyur? George Takkei? Rachel Maddow? Occupy Democrat?
Weird you chose to rely on such sources despite your "vast library of books"...
And how is your article on Iva doing?
well then. trump has made himself a good big bolshevik faction in the conservative party, aka Lenin, Or Adolf as he ousted the old guard, including the night of the long knives.
Now, the non-insane, real conservative party members have two choices: get behind him, but this insane narcissistic fuckhead will crush them later because he can't stand the smarter ones.
Or they can fall in line and help the Democrats remove this cockroach from American politics.
Now, the non-insane, real conservative party members have two choices: get behind him, but this insane narcissistic fuckhead will crush them later because he can't stand the smarter ones.
Or they can fall in line and help the Democrats remove this cockroach from American politics.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2019
- Messages
- 7,860
- Points
- 269
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
- Messages
- 87
- Points
- 74
LMAO... tell us how you really feel....
So many adjectives, I can feel your sense of powerlessness.
Thank you for sharing.
The only morality it recognises is that which is in its best interests. It forms a right to commit any crime, to lie and cheat in order to achieve its ends."
(Ronald Reagan; 1981)
He said this about the Soviet Union, but only because he didn't know the orange clown.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 14,194
- Points
- 338
Bye Liz, Bye.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 14,194
- Points
- 338
Considering the vast majority of his posts are translated ctrl-c-ctrl-v of post smade by other people (whom he never credits), and the substantial discrepancies (grammar, syntax, linguistic, format, style, etc...) between "lengthy posts" (result of copy-paste) and "short ones" (actual original posts made by Hiryu), one may indeed wonder...
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2019
- Messages
- 9,373
- Points
- 293
What kind of conservative are you really when most of the time you vote along with the opposition and have done so since long before Trump
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 14,194
- Points
- 338
Interesting development in the seizure at Mar-A-Lago.
The DOJ admitted to over-collecting documents, including but not limited to Trump's passports, such as document covered by various privileges.
DOJ has designated a process for separating materials that could be covered by executive privilege or attorney client privilege and hopes to return such memos to Trump within a couple of weeks. This raises serious, credible and legitimate questions about over-collection of evidence that could lead to significant legal challenges in the future. Notably protecting the president's 4th amendment, executive and attorney-client privileges.
Among the documents was a file on a presidential pardon regarding Roger Stone, which could help Republicans assert that the search was less about a document dispute (muh nukes) and more about a hunt for derogatory Jan 6 information.
So, the FBI basically was on a fishing expedition, with a warrant not being about classified information, though mentioned, but instead being about all sort of other documents. In short giving the FBI carte blanche to anything they wanted from the Trump home.
Even though! Even though Trump's legal team was communicating with both the DOJ and FBI for the past 4 months.
All this, incidentally, furthering the fact that Telmar's earlier take is FOS.
In addition to the fact he clearly does not understand how the Presidential Record Act works...
www.archives.gov
The DOJ admitted to over-collecting documents, including but not limited to Trump's passports, such as document covered by various privileges.
DOJ has designated a process for separating materials that could be covered by executive privilege or attorney client privilege and hopes to return such memos to Trump within a couple of weeks. This raises serious, credible and legitimate questions about over-collection of evidence that could lead to significant legal challenges in the future. Notably protecting the president's 4th amendment, executive and attorney-client privileges.
Among the documents was a file on a presidential pardon regarding Roger Stone, which could help Republicans assert that the search was less about a document dispute (muh nukes) and more about a hunt for derogatory Jan 6 information.
So, the FBI basically was on a fishing expedition, with a warrant not being about classified information, though mentioned, but instead being about all sort of other documents. In short giving the FBI carte blanche to anything they wanted from the Trump home.
Even though! Even though Trump's legal team was communicating with both the DOJ and FBI for the past 4 months.
All this, incidentally, furthering the fact that Telmar's earlier take is FOS.
In addition to the fact he clearly does not understand how the Presidential Record Act works...
Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978
The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents that were created or received after January 20, 1981 (i.e., beginning with the Reagan Administration). The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of...
www.archives.gov
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2019
- Messages
- 10,293
- Points
- 284
With regards the FBI collecting "evidence" this was an interesting case -Interesting development in the seizure at Mar-A-Lago.
The DOJ admitted to over-collecting documents, including but not limited to Trump's passports, such as document covered by various privileges.
DOJ has designated a process for separating materials that could be covered by executive privilege or attorney client privilege and hopes to return such memos to Trump within a couple of weeks. This raises serious, credible and legitimate questions about over-collection of evidence that could lead to significant legal challenges in the future. Notably protecting the president's 4th amendment, executive and attorney-client privileges.
Among the documents was a file on a presidential pardon regarding Roger Stone, which could help Republicans assert that the search was less about a document dispute (muh nukes) and more about a hunt for derogatory Jan 6 information.
So, the FBI basically was on a fishing expedition, with a warrant not being about classified information, though mentioned, but instead being about all sort of other documents. In short giving the FBI carte blanche to anything they wanted from the Trump home.
Even though! Even though Trump's legal team was communicating with both the DOJ and FBI for the past 4 months.
All this, incidentally, furthering the fact that Telmar's earlier take is FOS.
In addition to the fact he clearly does not understand how the Presidential Record Act works...
Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978
The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents that were created or received after January 20, 1981 (i.e., beginning with the Reagan Administration). The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of...
So party membership determines consciousness?What kind of conservative are you really when most of the time you vote along with the opposition and have done so since long before Trump
More specifically, the loudest screaming part of the party?
So a democrat is a democrat if he votes for every crazy thing that the AOC puts to a vote?
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2019
- Messages
- 9,373
- Points
- 293
When you call yourself a conservative, present yourself as such to voters in staunchly conservative areas to trick them into voting for you and are not just vocally opposed to conservatist ideology but also vote against conservative legislation and in favor of progressive legislation most of the time as has been the case for many of these "conservatives" for decades then it has nothing to do with consciousness and everything with bring a grifting fraud.
It's not a matter of one or two crazy ideas or an occasional passerby like Trump, it's a complete rejection of the values that the party and it's voters stand for in the decades that these critters cling to power. And the reason they stay in power is they get lots of money to outspend actual Republicans. Interest groups in conservative areas looking to donate to the Democratic party donate to the reigning RINO instead because they're Democrats in disguise.
Last edited:
you have described very nicely the conservative party and its opponent, and at least from a western european point of view its uneducated and or stupid and blind voters... but how does this fit in?
what do you mean by old principles? how old? if you remember from your reading, the democrats were for example supporters of slavery, the conservatives supported one war and opposed the other... and so on.
We've had this fool for 16 years, he's F***ed the country up, we're last in everything, impoverished half of the population , median wage 600 euro. But f***ing patriotism and illiberalism, only people can't afford to pay the bills, . Now your beloved narcissistic asshole is just as capable of that. But no mo
Similar threads
