• We are implementing a new rule regarding the posting of social media links and Youtube videos, the rule is simple if you are posting these links please say something about it rather than just dropping what we call a "drive by Link", a comment on your thoughts about the content must be included. Thank you

Firearms Showcase Your Firearms

My first M1 Carbine, some heathen had replaced the original stock with a low quality folding stock...effing "Band of Brothers"-SyndromeI Since then I have put it back into a n original WWII stock.

184867
184868
 
They actually have some impressively grained wood on a good few of them.
It would drive me crazy cleaning them.
 
Handed over my AR15 for destruction yesterday which was a sad sad moment. Then spent my Jacinda-Bucks on this:

y4mGWHPDIb9r3Bj6uPSUkN7yZ1fluOta0g7ktYJSJuE0CqrKw_psUC9GMuUnaviFuOvwxiPzSfhv1idIi-7zk0YSpEN819YgkQCXnpHWmkfAVrmJoTNeziXLz2BEGw74SVJAfABLO88ul-bN8O99ctJeBgIkdW9itgTBujMO7hkKcV7TXLkJKCBF9X48Lwu0W5S


Hammerli Tac R1 .22

I need to put a suppressor on it and a torch and I'm ready to go after possums again.
 
Handed over my AR15 for destruction yesterday which was a sad sad moment. Then spent my Jacinda-Bucks on this:

y4mGWHPDIb9r3Bj6uPSUkN7yZ1fluOta0g7ktYJSJuE0CqrKw_psUC9GMuUnaviFuOvwxiPzSfhv1idIi-7zk0YSpEN819YgkQCXnpHWmkfAVrmJoTNeziXLz2BEGw74SVJAfABLO88ul-bN8O99ctJeBgIkdW9itgTBujMO7hkKcV7TXLkJKCBF9X48Lwu0W5S


Hammerli Tac R1 .22

I need to put a suppressor on it and a torch and I'm ready to go after possums again.

Very nice, I've been thinking about getting one of the Chiappa M1-22 for something retro looking.
 
Bumping this thread and breaking a rule (apologies)

This is a M1 Carbine I’ll inherit from my step-grandfather, he owns it legally and I intend to own it legally as well and write up all the BS papers to the police station/Gendarmerie when something happens to him. The latter the better...





@TheKiwi @BravoZulu @riderboy
 
My first WWII rifle. A Garand that as rebuilt with a NOS barrel, complete with fully German proof marks! A collectors nightmare but a tack driver! The production date for the receiver is September 1941.

View attachment 184388
View attachment 184389View attachment 184390


I read that armorers on the battlefield would repair damaged rifles using intact spare parts from other rifles. Obviously serial numbers would not match, but I would think those repaired rifles would still be worth a lot based on their provenance, yes?
 
That’s true, @TheKiwi it was quite heavily modified to the point I wonder if Roosevelt would approve of it, at least it’s modernized in a nice way.

Ultimately I’ll have to mention to the Police I’m going to own it - I cannot put myself in trouble over this. If it’s too critical, no other choice than hand it over to the authorities. I need to read up about the firearms laws better since oh well step grandpa is deaf as f*** and it’s hard to even ask him who won last weekend football games.
 
I read that armorers on the battlefield would repair damaged rifles using intact spare parts from other rifles. Obviously serial numbers would not match, but I would think those repaired rifles would still be worth a lot based on their provenance, yes?

That's what happened. Most of the GI WWII small arms w find over here are "mixmasters", but not all of them...I have some nice M1 carbines that have all the original pieces.

I guess that they would get a price, but it's hard to tell how it would play out unless somebody imports these WWII small arms back to the US of A.

A few months back we had Steve Rutledge and Marty Morgan from the GCA visiting, they were quite excited about some of our WWII battlefield pick-ups.

watch
 
Back
Top