1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice
We are a non commercial community interested only in the discussion of all things military. We do not sell or authorise the use of images hosted on our servers, if you wish to purchase or use imagery contact the uploader directly.(you will need to register). Any requests received to purchase or use imagery will be ignored. Thank you and welcome to MI.Net
Dismiss Notice
You have been here as a guest for a while, I guess we are doing something right? Register as a member and join in the discussions, its completely free and we would welcome your contributions. All the best admin - MI.Net

photography Innocent photographer or terrorist?

Discussion in 'All Non Military Discussion' started by Drone_pilot, Apr 20, 2008.

  1. Drone_pilot United Kingdom

    Drone_pilot Mi General MI.Net Member

    Likes Received:
    Trophy Points:
    Misplaced fears about terror, privacy and child protection are preventing
    amateur photographers from enjoying their hobby, say campaigners.

    Phil Smith thought ex-EastEnder Letitia Dean turning on the Christmas lights
    in Ipswich would make a good snap for his collection.

    The 49-year-old started by firing off a few shots of the warm-up act on
    stage. But before the main attraction showed up, Mr Smith was challenged
    by a police officer who asked if he had a licence for the camera.

    After explaining he didn't need one, he was taken down a side-street for a
    formal "stop and search", then asked to delete the photos and ordered not
    take any more. So he slunk home with his camera.

    BBC Read More

    Thought id post this as most of us like to take photographs.
  2. John A Silkstone United Kingdom

    John A Silkstone Mi General MI.Net Member

    Likes Received:
    Trophy Points:
    This law obviously does not apply to the Paparazzi.

  3. Advisor

    Advisor Mi Staff Sergeant MI.Net Member

    Likes Received:
    Trophy Points:
    Is this the wave of the future? Oppressive laws & officious bureaucrats justifying any violation of rights because of 'security?' The question is, who, in the long run, will protect the citizen from his government?

Share This Page