Oh, I figured out already the topic would end up in Cyprus.=
View attachment 553344
Oh, history twist? Palestine's dispossession started pre-'48
Nakba 750k expelled before any "state." UN partition ignored by Israel expanding via provoked wars. Resistance isn't insanity; it's against endless settler grabs. Coexistence? When Israel halts demolitions and apartheid. Arabs in Knesset? Window dressing Nation-State Law says Jewish only. West Bank wall? "Security" for 700k illegal settlers fragmenting land; Palestinians face checkpoints, not vice versa.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Isolation sarcasm? Add Belgium arms halt, ICJ genocide case, economy down 20%. Golan vs. Cyprus? Israel's illegal annex since '81; Turkey's '74 intervention had UN talks ongoing.
About ehm, Cyprus "occupation" as your hypocrisy hammer? Turkey's 1974 intervention halted a Greek junta-backed coup that massacred Turkish Cypriots and aimed for full
Enosis annexation invoking 1960 treaty rights as guarantor to prevent
ethnic cleansing, with UN peacekeepers and ongoing federation talks (Annan Plan flopped 'cause Greeks voted no). Unlike Israel's illegal Golan annex (UNSC 497 says nope), Turkey didn't snatch for resources or bomb neighbors endlessly; it's a defensive buffer with bicommunal progress, while Bibi grabs land permanently.
en.wikipedia.org
Syria thread? You victim-blamed Palestinians first, then someone sees it as minority cleansing meanwhile, the 3% was 2% Druze, 1% Israeli: OCCUPATION!
Because the Arab Israeli war started immediately after the Palestinians rejected UNGA 181 in 1947, within days Fedayeen forces were attacking villages around Jerusalem triggering civil war. There were suicide bombers detonating themselves 50+ years before the Second Intifada.
The Zionist side accepted the partion plan and the Arab side rejected it outright. Perhaps a counter proposal of a "single state with rights protected for all" would have been better? By starting a war to drive out and eliminate the Jews, they kinda revealed themselves from the outset.
I fully accept that Zionist militias kicked out and murdered Palestinian Arabs during the Arab Israeli war, unfortunately starting a war has consequences. Most of those displaced left by their own will, Arab league orders and such, it's why they still had their keys with them. Jews were also killed and forced out of areas that Egypt and Jordan took over at the end of the war, it wasn't a one way street. Not to mention all the Mizrahi Jews who lost their homes because the Arabs were butthurt at losing a war they should've easily won if they weren't so S**t at it.
Also Black September and the Lebanese Civil War, what were they trying to achieve there? That's not their territory is it?
Nation state law is effectly symbolic and isn't binding, everyone knows Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people, the evidence is overwhelming and undeniable. In any case, everyone in Israel has equal rights, including the Palestinians from the other side of the green line that have intergrated and thrived. I repeat, apartheid is a specific policy of
racial segregation, which is not happening in Israel so that is a lie and you are a fool for claiming it.
Settlements are a grey area because of uti possidetis juris, since technically the successor state generally inherits all the land from the original boundaries.
Will terrorists stop trying to murder Israelis if the IDF stops demolishing their family homes in the aftermath? Does everything turn into sunshine and rainbows if Israel leaves the Palestinian territories, or is it simply the first step towards trying to carve out the rest of the region again? Rhetorical question, hence why Israel won't do a damn thing until Palestinians show themselves as actual partners for peace.
We didn't get to the Good Friday agreement in Northern Ireland until the PIRA put the weapons down and talked.
Belgium is a major supplier of weapons to Israel? Are you for real?
ICJ case is unlikely to rule against Israel, given the standard of evidence needed to reach that point, which is why no country in history has ever breached the 1948 genocide convention. It can be the only possible inference, there can be no other explanation for actions taken (ie war).
Any country at war is going to have a troubled economy, that's just standard. Meanwhile the country is a technological powerhub with many areas of business and investment within the sciences, AI etc.
I didn't say anything about Palestinians until you mentioned Israel:
since when israel is minority?
Won't deny it's an occupation, but it has a legitimate purpose and the sooner Syria plays ball, the sooner they can all place nice once again.