Usually an increase in volume decreases price, but in this case it will probably increase it due to labor and environmental costs.
An acceptable compromise for Germany, but not ideal for Ukraine unless Germany pays a license fee to offset the difference.
You're right, but it's a left-pocket-right-pocket kind of deal. Germany is bankrolling the majority of the Ukrainian war effort at this point, and Ukraine will order Diehl-made Flamingos with German money.
Also Diehl may want to produce all they like, but the Bundestag then has to approve an export license, and seeing as they're not willing to provide Taurus in order to not "provoke" russia, I don't see that happening.
Nope, the Diet actually has no say in this.
The National Security Council grants exports licences, which is the Federal Cabinet plus a couple of other officials. If the administration in charge is in agreement, that's all that it would take. (Ironically, the last Diet actually tried to force the Scholz administration to commence deliveries, but they had no jurisdicton over that, so all their votes amounted only to a non-binding resolution.)
I see no reason why they'd block the sale of Flamingo production lots to Ukraine. Taurus is a different story. Its delivery to Ukraine was blocked because it requires German military input to use—much like Storm Shadow does, which is why the Brits have been deploying "advisors" to Ukraine for well over three years now. Germany won't do that, though.
There's also the issue of the American-made engine in that thing. Biden had indicated that America would veto an export to Ukraine, and as for Trump, well, there's no chance in hell that he'd endorse such a plan.
Better than nothing is better than nothing, but it's not a guaranteed success like the Tomahawk is.
That is, unfortunately, quite true. Let's hope for the best.