• We are implementing a new rule regarding the posting of social media links and Youtube videos, the rule is simple if you are posting these links please say something about it rather than just dropping what we call a "drive by Link", a comment on your thoughts about the content must be included. Thank you
A Russian special forces unit storms a Ukrainian army stronghold. The video was also filmed by a drone. In the video, the 16th Separate Special Forces Brigade of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Ministry of Defense storms the positions of the 63rd Separate Mechanized Brigade of the Ukrainian Army. The video was filmed on the approaches to Krasny Liman. Since 2014, the Ukrainian army has built a multi-layered system of strongholds and fortifications around Krasny Liman. During the assault, special forces use small arms and grenades.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
More Blunderkrieg

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Ukraine devastating against Crimea
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Yes, interesting question. What is a bigger threat to Europe? Putin or millions of migrants who consider themselves conquerors?

Both can be true.
 
Putin using poor Cubans and Colombians as canon fodder!
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
On the Russian navy's impotence
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Possible implications of Ukrainian long range strikes
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Yes, interesting question. What is a bigger threat to Europe? Putin or millions of migrants who consider themselves conquerors?

Both can be true.
Both are true. For eastern Europe Russia is a existential threat and migrants a nuisance. For the rest of the west id say both
Nukes nuke that's all you have with Russia you need to stop with the cold war mentality the Warsaw pack don't exist anymore!
It's a ridiculous to think Russia doesn't have a brigade or two, to do a small incursion into Estonia with long range drones and cruise missile in reserve, threat tactical nukes if NATO tries to push them back with force. Will nato break or step in? In 2029 NATO is more ready for such a conventional confrontation (more deterrence to deter them from even trying) but today does NATO have the will and capability to send 1-2 divisions worth of troops to Estonia on short notice and risk nuclear war? I don't want to find out.
 
The state of Russia tanks
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
look out for 2029 🙄
 
Both are true. For eastern Europe Russia is a existential threat and migrants a nuisance. For the rest of the west id say both

It's a ridiculous to think Russia doesn't have a brigade or two, to do a small incursion into Estonia with long range drones and cruise missile in reserve, threat tactical nukes if NATO tries to push them back with force. Will nato break or step in? In 2029 NATO is more ready for such a conventional confrontation (more deterrence to deter them from even trying) but today does NATO have the will and capability to send 1-2 divisions worth of troops to Estonia on short notice and risk nuclear war? I don't want to find out.
I suppose anything is possible, but boy, what a stupid move for Russia. I suspect Putin wants to keep enough troops around to secure Moscow, and maybe even any trouble with his friend and neighbor China.

Notwithstanding all that, an incursion into Estonia is an unambiguous attack on NATO. Beyond all that, even if Russia has the extra forces, they definitely don't have the logistics to support them. That brigade or two, would run out of gas, ammo and food within a week.

You never know what Putin will do, but he'd have to be on a bad acid trip to order that. I'd also think the Russian plutocracy would be thinking, "WTF man!!!!!!!!!"
 
Last edited:
It's a ridiculous to think Russia doesn't have a brigade or two, to do a small incursion into Estonia with long range drones and cruise missile in reserve, threat tactical nukes if NATO tries to push them back with force. Will nato break or step in? In 2029 NATO is more ready for such a conventional confrontation (more deterrence to deter them from even trying) but today does NATO have the will and capability to send 1-2 divisions worth of troops to Estonia on short notice and risk nuclear war? I don't want to find out.
That's the thing most people including "experts" and policy makers don't understand. The 1st Guards Tank Army doesn't need to roll into the Baltics supported by several more Armies and the Belarussian army guarding it's flank and executing supportive thrusts to the south.

They only need to move in one VDV regiment to occupy a few villages or a stretch of road just across the border in any of the Baltics under the pretence of coming to the aid of ethnic russians and have the Kremlin state that any further concentration of NATO forces or acts of "aggression" near the russian border will be considered a declaration of war with nuclear weapon use on the table.

If NATO in any way flinches the organisation is done because it's eastern members will know that no one will come to their aid. "No one wants to die over Narva."

There is no coming back from that terminal break down in trust.
 
There is no coming back from that terminal break down in trust.
Exactly, and here's the thing: We know that the Russians have had that idea on their mind for decades. As early as 1982, Warsaw Pact planners assumed that NATO would disintegrate in the event of a Russian attack, as most countries would opt not to resist. Which is why our apathy towards their continued provocations is so dangerous. If they think they can get away with needle pricks, next time they'll come with a dagger.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

more russian terror tactics, or their so called human safari. :mad:
 
This is just despicable.
There is no coming back from that terminal break down in trust.
As an addendum; this is also why it's so infuriatingly disingenuous when people like John Mearsheimer accuse NATO of having provoked the conflict by not agreeing to Russia's autumn 2021 ultimatum. Which, if anyone needs reminding, contained a clause that NATO should rescind its security guarantees for all countries which had joined the alliance after 1990.

This was a colossal provocation, and in previous centuries, would have led to open war right away. Putin would've never accepted NATO demands to agree never to defend Russia's CIS allies. And would've been right to do so. They're patently unacceptable.
 
That's the thing most people including "experts" and policy makers don't understand. The 1st Guards Tank Army doesn't need to roll into the Baltics supported by several more Armies and the Belarussian army guarding it's flank and executing supportive thrusts to the south.

They only need to move in one VDV regiment to occupy a few villages or a stretch of road just across the border in any of the Baltics under the pretence of coming to the aid of ethnic russians and have the Kremlin state that any further concentration of NATO forces or acts of "aggression" near the russian border will be considered a declaration of war with nuclear weapon use on the table.

If NATO in any way flinches the organisation is done because it's eastern members will know that no one will come to their aid. "No one wants to die over Narva."

There is no coming back from that terminal break down in trust.
Who would you expect to fight and who would you expect to make excuses?

This is what a retired General says. Not everyone might share in his gusto.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Who would you expect to fight and who would you expect to make excuses?
If you've read the CIA document linked above, the Soviets figured that entire countries would surrender to them. I don't think it's (all) that easy, especially since Russia's aggression has considerably increased the readiness of Europeans to fight for their countries (even in sluggish Germany, the ratio went from 22% to 61%, for example).

The Eastern Europeans and Scandinavians, most wary of Russia due to proximity, would certainly fight, the fate of Ukraine present in their minds. I'd figure the West Europeans and North Americans would join the fight, but perhaps be less enthusiastic about it.

Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Turkey, Portugal and Spain are the candidates which I'd deem unreliable. Hungary and Slovakia have pro-Russian governments; Bulgaria is the most pro-Russian country in Europe; and Portugal and Spain won't feel as affected due to the distance between them and the threat. Spain is also ruled by a fiercely pacifist socialist government.

Turkey is a wild card. Erdogan wants his country to become a major player in its own right, he'll do whatever he thinks helps that plan the most. In the past, he's been as likely to work against Moscow as for it.

At the end of the day, NATO's reaction would also depend on the nature of Russia's aggression. If they're stupid enough to support their hypothetical incursion with activities in other NATO states, they would certainly elicit a stronger popular response.

And they're probably stupid enough to do that, too. Just look at what they're doing now—airspace violations, explicit verbal threats, acts of sabotage, even targeted killings. If they were smart, they'd stop making Europeans feel threatened by Russia.
 
Last edited:
Crimea Plunge Into Darkness again:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top