Warfare Iran War Thread | US & Israel forces.

[Vorph]

War Crime

noun

Any action undertaken by the world's only Jewish state.

 

[Ivan le Fou]

War Crime

noun

Any action undertaken by the world's only Jewish state.

And Trump.

 

[NebrHogger]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Sounds like they are asking for a re-match.

If things continue to go badly for them, these guys could find work running drugs from S America!

 

[BeNder]

Iran war is "not over" until highly enriched uranium is removed, Israel's Netanyahu says

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the war with Iran is "not over" because there's still highly enriched uranium that needs to be removed from the country.

share.google

 

[Mike1976]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Musashi]

No more ass kissing?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Ivan le Fou]

Ah yes... an unsourced, BS story from 2 months ago, created by the same individual and reposted every months...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Must be so nice to live in a world of fiction and fantasy.

 

[profyler]

Ah yes... an unsourced, BS story from 2 months ago, created by the same individual and reposted every months...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Must be so nice to live in a world of fiction and fantasy.

This is why I was saying that you all here take those very dubious Twitter accoutns just to serious

 

[Ivan le Fou]

This is why I was saying that you all here take those very dubious Twitter accoutns just to serious

It depends.

Some provide "analysis" and some others report "news".

However, not all of the analysis are either accurate or reliable. Some are entirely baseless and built on wishes, fiction or drugs/alcohol/stupidity. As we have seen posted.
Just like not all of the news are, similarly, accurate and reliable. Some are propaganda, such as claims made by the IRGC, and some others are nothing but absolute fabrication. Such as the one just posted before.

One can be easily verified; if it belongs to the "news" it will be reported by other, referenced, cross-referenced and factually checked. It either happened, or it didn't. A thing was said or it wasn't.
The other, however, is harder to verify because it requires analytical skills, analytical will and intellectual honesty. Some analysis can be off without any ill-intents behind them, the analyst was just wrong. But some analysis can be willfully off because the analyst aimed at deceiving the audience for whatever reason.

That's only one part of the problem. People are free to produce whatever they want: to either be meaningful and productive contributors to the conversation, or to be dimwitted obnoxious trolls.

The other part is the people choosing to share whatever was produced, and the reason why they shared whatever they shared.

As exemplified here, for instance, the purpose wasn't to contribute in any meaningful and intelligent was. But to sh*t in the soup by sharing something entirely and demonstrably false.

The good thing about this, though, is that you get assess people for who and what they are. Of course one would post such a thing, and of course another would thumbs it up, because the behavior matches the pattern.

 

[BeNder]

So Iran is starting to dump crude in the Gulf. The world is going to blame us.

 

[Mike1976]

So Iran is starting to dump crude in the Gulf. The world is going to blame us.

Similar to what analists are saying; that Iran wants the US to restart the war so they can take the blame.

Like Trump gives a flying f*ck about what the Euroc*cks and Chicoms think, never mind the entirely irrelevant nations.

 

[NebrHogger]

So Iran is starting to dump crude in the Gulf. The world is going to blame us.

Dear little Greta is oddly quiet about this. She must be having a great time on her love boat flotilla.

 

[Chazman]

It depends.

Some provide "analysis" and some others report "news".

However, not all of the analysis are either accurate or reliable. Some are entirely baseless and built on wishes, fiction or drugs/alcohol/stupidity. As we have seen posted.
Just like not all of the news are, similarly, accurate and reliable. Some are propaganda, such as claims made by the IRGC, and some others are nothing but absolute fabrication. Such as the one just posted before.

One can be easily verified; if it belongs to the "news" it will be reported by other, referenced, cross-referenced and factually checked. It either happened, or it didn't. A thing was said or it wasn't.
The other, however, is harder to verify because it requires analytical skills, analytical will and intellectual honesty. Some analysis can be off without any ill-intents behind them, the analyst was just wrong. But some analysis can be willfully off because the analyst aimed at deceiving the audience for whatever reason.

That's only one part of the problem. People are free to produce whatever they want: to either be meaningful and productive contributors to the conversation, or to be dimwitted obnoxious trolls.

The other part is the people choosing to share whatever was produced, and the reason why they shared whatever they shared.

As exemplified here, for instance, the purpose wasn't to contribute in any meaningful and intelligent was. But to sh*t in the soup by sharing something entirely and demonstrably false.

The good thing about this, though, is that you get assess people for who and what they are. Of course one would post such a thing, and of course another would thumbs it up, because the behavior matches the pattern.

It's safe to say that anyone with a Canadian flag and a picture of Kamala in their bio, can be considered an anti-American Communist. Which is fine, just don't get your "news" from them.

 

[Ivan le Fou]

So Iran is starting to dump crude in the Gulf. The world is going to blame us.

Well yeah, if you had not started the war, it wouldn't have happened!

Anyway, Iran is running out of storage for their oil, that much was foreseeable.

It does, however, constitutes a serious ecological threat and also a serious threat for the fishing industry.

 

[BeNder]

Trump calling Obama out

 

[Chazman]

Trump calling Obama out

Obama knows if his crimes are exposed his goose is cooked. He even went to visit Commie Canada and PM Carny a few days ago, in order to coordinate actions. He's cracking up, even saying that the stress that Trump is giving him is affecting his marriage. LOL!

 

[Mike1976]

He's cracking up, even saying that the stress that Trump is giving him is affecting his marriage. LOL!

But how is the man of the house coping?

 

[Chazman]

But how is the man of the house coping?

Big Mike?

 

[BeNder]

Hegseth says Pentagon will review Mark Kelly comments about US weapons stockpile

The defence secretary accuses the senator of "blabbing on TV", after Kelly expressed concern about the US munitions stockpile.

bbc.com

 

[Mike1976]

American officials say

that Pakistan often presents "a more positive picture" of Iran's stance "than the reality"

which pushes Trump's allies to press the Pakistani intermediaries to be more frank in their communications with Tehran . .

We mentioned this previously

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies