PTSD, Is It Contagious or Just Politically Correct ?

03Fox2/1

Corporal - USMC
MI.Net Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
217
Points
38
disregard, 03Fox2/1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fox, my guess is that PTSD as with most things is not either 0% or 100%. There are degrees of PTSD. From my understanding, it is a very normal reaction to a very abnormal situation. It enables the mind to cope with the immediate job at hand, other words to survive. That way in a more secure environment the mind can deal with it then.

Problem, that I have been told, is not PTSD, it is ignoring it. DROS greatly effected RVN Vets ability to cope with PTSD. In WWII, a lot of the troops went over together and came back together, that in itself allow them to talk to each other about horrific events which help to deal with the patterning effects of PTSD. In RV a lot of Vets went over by themselves and came home by themselves. People at Home had no clue about RVN, and there was no natural healing of PTSD as with the WWII Vets. It exacerbated the problem.

It is my experience the PTSD is not well known. The cultural view is very much in error. Sort of like the Hollyweird version of the RVN Vet as a psychotic derange murdering machine. When in real life RVN Vets rate above average as good to excellent citizens. Not saying some are not dealing with demons, but they are not doing it as Hollyweird would want most to believe.
 
I have no axe to grind with those who suffer from PTSD.

Me niether

I believe the definition of PTSD has become so diluted and become so politically correct, that almost anyone who serves in the military now qualifies as a viable candidate for this disorder.

I agree 100%

I take you back to WWI, now I know that there were cases of severe shell shock and I assume that cases of acute PTSD were evident but not yet diagnosed.. unfortunately. How many of the troops attempted to claim some disabling illness as a result of the trauma they suffered?, I doubt many at all, but that doesnt mean it wasnt there (I hasten to add).

Maybe the Political correctness that 03Fox2/1 speaks of is true?, maybe that to deal with the horrible reality of war it becomes PC to tell all those around you that you are now suffering because it would be assumed that you are some kind of monster if it did not affect you.

I have demons from war and from the job I do and I have considered addressing this with others, but never have, why? because in my case it is no more severe than that of a member of the public witnessing a serous car crash or a parent suffering the loss of a young child. You see we can all claim PTSD but do we do it justifiably??.

To claim PTSD when really all your problem revolves around is a tragic incident which has occured during your time in service, is to me totally unacceptable and is relatively easy to overcome without claiming the matle of PTSD.

Again I hope my ramblings have made some sense to someone.

I will finish by saying that anybody truly suffering, this is not directed at you, but those that it does refer to please give your head a shake and get on with your life, dont jump the PTSD train because it does not help those are ar really suffering..


Semper Fidelis
Per Mare Per Terram
UBIQUE

sal;
 
Last edited by a moderator:
disregard, 03Fox2/1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hate the war, don't hate the warrior

Best statement I have ever heard mate (Y)

UBIQUE
Per Mare Per Terram
Semper Fi
 
I am not sure what is being said here. IN the US the VA can rate a problem anywheres from 0% disabling to 100% permanent and total. Obvious with some others, such as a % for unemployablity. Rocky would probably be the best person to comment on this.

A person can have the tip of his finger lost in the service, I am not sure if he file a claim if anything would happen or the VA would just say he gets 0% for a tip of figer loss. Meaning the VA will take care of that finger if anything problem arise form the lost of the tip of the figer. 0% means there is no monetary award.

Also the VA will take care of veterans who have non-service connected injuries. Service connection usually have priority over non service connection. Meaning a Vet looses the tip of a finger in a wood working accident at home would get basically the same care.

A person can get 0% for PTSD (Not sure if the VA would do this) and for all practical purpose it has no advantage or benefits as a Vet with out any claim. The VA offers to Vets and Families adjust counseling/work counseling for adjustment to civilian life to any Vet.

I read where English Vets are finally able to get compensation for injuries for non-hostile action. As far as I know the US VA does not differentiate, a person who is 100% gets the same award whether the disability was from hostilities or "work related", say a traffic accident in the states.
 
disregard, 03Fox2/1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe my message and my feelings about the subject of my post to be crystal clear. Perhaps there is very little we have in common and perhaps there is much you and I see differently. From my experiences and my perception, my post reflects not only my knowledge, but also my emotions associated with my journey, started long ago in Vietnam. I speak only for myself, but I represent many of similar nature.

I was actually responding to Bombardier. I am not sure what prompted a seeming hostile reply.

I am not a clinician or counselor. I did get involved in Pointman Ministries about ten years ago. They offer a Lay counseling service to help Vet but with a religious flavor some like Rocky does (with out a religious base). I have not been involved with them for over 6 years.

My understanding come from training sessions on counseling, knowing clinicians and councilors. I am not a authority on this issue but stated what I was told.
It seems to me what society says about PTSD is not what it is about. It is not a "war" only problem. Let me be very clear, I AM NOT A EXPERT on the topic, so I can be way off base.

I am not sure what all we do share in common, probably more than less in common. One aspect of counseling and from other life experience, Is I learn a very different approach to dealing with people. Regardless of what another does to me, what matters to me is how I react/respond. Abuse is never justified.

Our current conflict in Iraq is about a culture of lawlessness, based on abuse and continuing abuse. A individual can be judge, jury and executioner and the victims family can and is expected to revenge any wrong doing by doing the same. Hopefully the Iraq people will succeed in developing a lawful society. I know Iraq is not RVN and type of combat is very different and not in comparison to the amount of intensity. Example 1968, we lost over 16,000 Americans in RVN (may be off a little). Iraq is no where near that.


1st Gulf war, I heard other RVN vets bemoaning the "welcome home" that those warrior received. I think one of the reason the Gulf War Soldiers received a good welcome home was because of RVN Vets, insuring the mistakes of RVN not be continued. Those that bemoaned the home comings felt differently. Yes the 100 Hr Gulf War 1 was light compared to RVN, but why should we not welcome them home? Two wrongs never make a right.

I have a very close friend in 5th Group SF, I am greatly honored to have him a friend and admire his commitment and duty to the US people. I have other friends who are currently deployed, some are National Guard. The treatment RVN vets received during the RVN conflict and after was deplorable, but that does not say we should not correct those wrongs and NOT help Today's Soldiers and New Vets to be better treated.

Regardless if PTSD is PC or what ever, I think if we can improve the quality of treatment the VA offers to our service men and women I agree. IMHO, those decession should be in the hands of people who know more than both of us.
 
This link is pretty good, it is from the VA on PTSD.

http://www.ncptsd.va.gov/facts/general/fs_effects.html

The other aspect that maybe missing, is that PTSD does not always travel alone it can travel with;

Survival guilt,
Substance abuse
Physical abuse to oneself or others
Low self esteem
Latent morning
Etc.....

Hopefully Rocky will Add or correct any errors of mine.
 
disregard, 03Fox2/1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do regret deleting my own thread, when in a moment of weakness and overwhelming panic, I decided that I had revealed too much about my demons and my own battle with PTSD and survivors guilt. I see now that this was a cowardly action and since this latest spammer-hacker has chosen to visit this thread, I feel nothing but sorrow that I took such an easy way out. I feel nothing but contempt for people like this latest spammer and it is people like him that convinced me to delete my own words that mean so much to me, then and now.
Semper Fi
 
I feel nothing but contempt for people like this latest spammer and it is people like him that convinced me to delete my own words that mean so much to me, then and now.

he's gone and banned mate.
 
Scott, I'm sorry that the likes of this pus pocket has prompted you to delete your heart-felt words. It's a big enough shame that so many of our posts have been lost beyond recovery due to hackers compromising this site without us taking them out ourselves. Please resist the urge to do this in the future, my friend. You can't let these gobs of spit get to you personally. They're just random, and Bombardier and Droney will chop them off at the knees as soon as they're detected.
 
They're just random, and Bombardier and Droney will chop them off at the knees as soon as they're detected.

Damn Right we will
 
Scott, I'm sorry that the likes of this pus pocket has prompted you to delete your heart-felt words. It's a big enough shame that so many of our posts have been lost beyond recovery due to hackers compromising this site without us taking them out ourselves. Please resist the urge to do this in the future, my friend. You can't let these gobs of spit get to you personally. They're just random, and Bombardier and Droney will chop them off at the knees as soon as they're detected.



Well said. Thanks for the post.
 
Tom,
Thank you for your considerate words.
They are like a warm poncho liner on a cold dark night, or that first smoke when dawn finally breaks the cloak of darkness and you finally can see that enemy soldier that you feared all night, really is just a clump of bamboo.
Much appreciated by me and myself, former and present.
As I said, I do regret deleting my contributions on many of the threads here.
At the time, in my frame of mind, it seemed the right thing to do. Still, after my exposure to so many wannabes and fakes and confrontational know-it-all's on so many sites, I often wonder if it is all worth it. My initial attempt at posting was to break my silence and try to publicly renounce all of the many false impressions about those of us that seemed to have fought this war, so long ago. Despite the recent deluge of books written by anyone remotely associated with VietNam, I still feel that we chosen few have been relegated to the pages of history with much misinformation and a lot of manipulation of history. So much recent empty fanfare can not erase my memory of what I consider a great injustice to those men that fell in battle. I still remember the many years of indifference and neglect that many of us suffered through and I have not forgotten nor have I forgave my countrymen for the terrible way we were treated. It has taken me many long years to realize that I am bitter, something I always denied before. I try to speak for others and at the same time help myself, something I have always been reticent to do. I don't like bringing attention to myself and I feel that sometimes I become selfish with my thoughts and memories from VietNam. I try to speak about my personal experiences and yet remain removed and distant from the story. As you know, this is impossible and pointless anyway. I admire your recall of so many facts... I am better at relating how it felt to go on your first patrol instead of the coordinates and specific details. How it felt to see your first platoon leader killed in front of you, make numerous mistakes myself, any of which should have gotten me killed, and still survive that patrol and many more, all for the glory of Corps and Country. Exactly where I was and how many men were involved and the accurate dates and time of day.... I'll leave that to others or after-action-reports. I feel war emotionally more than I remember dates and locations. After all is said and done, in all wars, courage and honor are present as well as cowardice and hate. I still want people to know the difference between those of us that fought honorably and those that became no better than the enemy. Some say wars are fought by the strong to protect the weak. I say some wars are fought by the innocent to protect the guilty.
Semper Fi
 
Fox
Understand where you're coming from, bro. PTSD? I don't know. We were all changed in some way by our experience. And, we all deal with it in different ways. Is that PTSD..the change? Who knows. I do know that I changed...some for the good & some for the bad. After all these years, I have come to understand that the bad changes just built on a lot of crap that happened to me as a kid. Knowing it doesn't stop the bad feelings, the anger, the guilt, the whatever. It just helps to understand it. After almost 40 years, I have become fairly comfortable with myself. I can tell you this...I don't give a shite about what anyone's idea of a VN vet is. I know who I am and that is all that counts. If others don't agree with that, sod 'em. One thing that came out of a lot of the nasty crap we did face when we came home is my determination that no SOB will ever do that to another generation of vets. Criticize the war ( I do) but keep your mouth of the youngsters fighting it.
I agree that wars are fought by the innocent to protect the guilty and also that wars are started by old men and fought by the young.
 
One thing that came out of a lot of the nasty crap we did face when we came home is my determination that no SOB will ever do that to another generation of vets. Criticize the war ( I do) but keep your mouth of the youngsters fighting it.


I think, that is probably the most important part. The other part I would add, is that what adds to the confusion of PTSD is our collective understanding of it. I think most people are get mixed information and really don't know what it is. The Hollyweird, psychopathic vets is definitely not it. The general media, Vet gone criminal is definitely not it. There are some good books and pamphlets (from the VA and Vet service organizations) that can point a person in the right direction.

If anything, PTSD says that a person is normal person, who experienced a very abnormal traumatic situation. It is the coping with that situation that causes problems. Our natural tendencies are usually wrong. Burying it along with some other coping mechanisms only makes it worse.

There are byproducts from not dealing with PTSD, most cause problems, either interpersonal, anger, self medication, etc.
 
Soldier from the War Returning: The Greatest Generation's Troubled Homecoming from World War II (9780618773688): Thomas Childers

This whole PTSD thing is not new. Would recommend reading this book. Story of 3 vets & the postwar life they had. The author's father was one.
Reading this explains some things about that generation that I never did understand.
 
There is another book written for the family of the Vet. Recovering from the War, by Patience Mason. Her husband wrote Chicken Hawk. The diagnosis was not completely or usuable till about 1985, yet as Advisor wrote, it goes back in time. I would ad it goes back to he beginning of our existence.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top