John A Silkstone
31-01-09, 07:37
UK Army 'Smug' And 'Complacent'
The head of Britain's military has labelled the country's armed forces "smug" and "complacent".
UK Army 'Smug' And 'Complacent' Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup said soldiers "rested on (their) laurels" when attempting to mount counter-insurgency operations in theatres of war.
Sir Jock, the Chief of the Defence Staff, said the troops' long experience in Northern Ireland was the reason for their misplaced confidence.
He also acknowledged the British's performance in Afghanistan had drawn criticism from some Americans.
And the Air Chief Marshal warned that such differences must not be allowed to "fracture and disintegrate" the cohesion of the allies fighting the Taliban.
"You are only as good as your next success not your last one," he told The Economist magazine, accepting there had been a degree of complacency within the Army.
The Ministry of Defence last night rejected claims in the interview that his comments described the naivety of British troops in Afghanistan.
Sir Jock had referred to conduct in Iraq, the MoD said.
"Initially in Iraq our traditional counter-insurgency strategies, developed on successes in Northern Ireland, needed to evolve to meet the changing threat," a spokesman said.
A "fundamental reappraisal" of Britain's counter-insurgency training, doctrine and structures was now under way and would be completed shortly, Sir Jock said.
He also issued a word of warning if, as is expected, US President Barack Obama asks Britain and other Nato allies to send more troops to Afghanistan in an effort to secure a strategic breakthrough.
"We will have some capacity, if required, to provide more forces for Afghanistan but it will be a limited capacity," he said.
He called on other European allies to take on "the burden" of fighting against the Taliban.
The head of Britain's military has labelled the country's armed forces "smug" and "complacent".
UK Army 'Smug' And 'Complacent' Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup said soldiers "rested on (their) laurels" when attempting to mount counter-insurgency operations in theatres of war.
Sir Jock, the Chief of the Defence Staff, said the troops' long experience in Northern Ireland was the reason for their misplaced confidence.
He also acknowledged the British's performance in Afghanistan had drawn criticism from some Americans.
And the Air Chief Marshal warned that such differences must not be allowed to "fracture and disintegrate" the cohesion of the allies fighting the Taliban.
"You are only as good as your next success not your last one," he told The Economist magazine, accepting there had been a degree of complacency within the Army.
The Ministry of Defence last night rejected claims in the interview that his comments described the naivety of British troops in Afghanistan.
Sir Jock had referred to conduct in Iraq, the MoD said.
"Initially in Iraq our traditional counter-insurgency strategies, developed on successes in Northern Ireland, needed to evolve to meet the changing threat," a spokesman said.
A "fundamental reappraisal" of Britain's counter-insurgency training, doctrine and structures was now under way and would be completed shortly, Sir Jock said.
He also issued a word of warning if, as is expected, US President Barack Obama asks Britain and other Nato allies to send more troops to Afghanistan in an effort to secure a strategic breakthrough.
"We will have some capacity, if required, to provide more forces for Afghanistan but it will be a limited capacity," he said.
He called on other European allies to take on "the burden" of fighting against the Taliban.